Edutopia article about Student Led Conferences
This document is my final project for MIEA 580 Innovative Practices course at Endicott. The project outlines an innovation and the process for the implementation of it within my school. I have included the entire text within the the body of this post.
Rooting of the innovation
itself
The International Baccalaureate
Organization (IBO) has a shifted approach toward learning than that of
traditional models. One of the tenants
of this shift is the focus on students understanding the process of how they learn
and reflecting upon this process. Summative
assessments in the Middle Years Program (MYP) fall under four different
criteria categories: knowing and understanding, investigating, communicating,
and thinking critically. Each of these
criterion are broken down into specific strands and the MYP requires that each
strand is assessed at least twice each year.
The investigating criterion is required to be in each assessment and
contains the strand; evaluate the process and results of
the investigation (International
Baccalaureate Organization, 2014).
Blogging, when
used in education, has been found to create greater engagement amongst
students. This is primarily due to the
aspect that the students thoughts and ideas are being published to a larger
community and possibly even the world (Shana
& Abulibdehb, 2015). When students know that their writing will be
seen and reviewed by their peers, they tend to publish work of a higher
quality, focusing on critical thinking (Konkel & Gammack, 2015).
Student led conferences, in contrast
to parent teacher conferences, provide the student the opportunity to own their
learning. Students, in these
conferences, are the focus of the meeting as opposed to the adults, parents and
teacher, talking about the child. Research
shows that when students feel as though they own their learning they develop
strategies to help themselves with their development. Students gain more of a sense of
responsibility for their learning (Goodman, 2008).
Process of Implementation
St. Francis is an International
Baccalaureate (IB) school providing each of the Primary Years Program (PYP),
Middle Years Program (MYP), and Diploma Program (DP) following the inquiry
model of learning. A need has arisen
from informal conversations with teachers that then moved on to formal
conversations with administration for students to demonstrate the process of
their learning in a way that can be shared with parents (Brown & Berger,
2014). The school’s mission is directly
tied to the IB and they have come to recognize this need to be in accordance
with the IB philosophy and requirements (Davidovich, 2010).
Once the issue had been recognized
the school decided to look at the options available that would fit the school
and provide the students with the best format in which to display their ideas
(Brown & Berger, 2014). The two
elements that were deemed most important in choosing this format were providing
for authentic self-reflection and ability to display student progress for the
purpose of student led conferences.
The educational technology
integration specialist researched common practices for E-portfolios comparing
the use of blogs and student created websites.
The specialist decided, in consultation with the MYP 1 subject teachers
that the use of blogs aligned with the interests of the school, the teachers,
and the students alike primarily because of blogs’ process journal-like nature
in order to demonstrate the students growth and learning. Blogs also provide a medium for students to
upload summative assessment pieces that they have produced throughout the year,
whether that be in the form of a document, video, photograph, or sound
recording. The use of student created
websites, in contrast, is excellent for displaying summative assessment pieces,
but was lacking the reflective process component.
The educational technology
integration specialist then created their own personal learning blog to be used
as an example of what the students would be producing. This is an authentic learning blog as the
educator is currently in the process of gaining their masters degree in
education. As the personal learning blog
program is put into action, as an expansion, the hope is to develop a view of
the stakeholders in the school as a learning community, encouraging other
teachers and administrators to create their own learning blogs. The example blog along with research material
on blogging for learning and E-portfolios will then be distributed to known
early adopters and heads of department to hopefully spark some conversations
and interest amongst staff.
The school has decided to initially begin
with the whole of MYP 1 using blogs as process journals and online
portfolios. It will be necessary to consult
with all of the MYP 1 teachers and train them on how the students will be using
the blogs. It will be recommended for
the teachers to create their own process blogs to act as models for
students. In understanding that
implementing a new innovation will create disruption, it is important for the
staff to feel prepared and well supported in any new widespread initiative
(Davidovich, 2010). The Design teacher will be the point person
for the project, launching and assisting the students with the technical
aspects of creating a blog and following through with keeping the information
from the different classes organized in a way that will be presentable (Brown
& Berger, 2014).
Throughout the year the students will be
required to post at least once a week within a rotation of which subject area
they will be writing about. One week
reflecting on their learning in Math, the next week on Individuals and
Societies, and so on. The teachers will
need to be aware of when and how often they are requiring their students to be
posting, as there is a concern of overburdening the students with too much
writing. For example, it would pose an
issue for students to be required to write a post for each of their classes
each week.
In order to be transparent and open,
there will be a coffee morning (informational meeting) held with the parents of
the MYP 1 students. This meeting will
provide the reasoning as to why the school has chosen to begin this initiative,
what the parents can expect as far as the frequency and quality their students
will be required to post to their learning blogs, as well as introducing the
idea of the student led parent conferences that will be held later in the year.
In the past, parent teacher conferences
have been conducted with the summative assessments and grades as the focus of
the meetings. Teachers sit across from
the parents and the students and discuss how the student has performed during
the term. The shift that will occur with
the student led conferences will be that the student is the one who is running
this session. The focus of the student
led conference will be on the progress that has been evidenced in the students
learning blog. The students will be able
to show how they have approached their learning in their own words pointing to
specific steps and understandings they have had in the process leading up to
their summative assessment pieces.
Conclusion
The
objectives of these two innovations being brought into the school are as follows:
1.
Increase
student engagement with their learning
2.
Deepen
understanding of material and concepts presented in class
3.
Engender
student critical reflection upon their learning
4.
Focus
on the processes of learning
5.
Develop
organizational skills by consolidating students learning processes into one
format
6.
Document
and display student learning processes
7.
Shift
the focus from student achievement to student development
8.
Create
a learning community within the school
9.
Provide
a format for parents to become engaged in their student’s learning
10. Strengthen student ownership of their
learning
The two initiatives have the potential to
have large effects on student learning.
They will change the way the school approaches learning and this will be
in accordance with the IB philosophy and requirements. This philosophy should be at the heart of any
and all decisions or initiatives that school implements in the future. The development of this plan has taken into
account the many factors that lead to successful adoption of innovations as
described by Davidovich (2010) and the case study of Brown and Berger
(2014). The considerations that were
made were:
1.
Recognition
of a problem within the school (Brown & Berger, 2014)
2.
Creating
a clear vision of how the innovation will support the school guiding statements
(Davidovich, 2010)
3.
The
rethinking of constraints (asking why we do what we do in the way that we do
it?) (Brown & Berger, 2014)
4.
Consider
the many options (Brown & Berger, 2014)
5.
Consider
the impact of the disruption to the community (Davidovich, 2010)
6.
Empower
the stakeholders to be part of the process (Brown & Berger, 2014)
7.
Understand
the process of innovation (Davidovich, 2010)
References
Brown, M.M., & Berger, A. (2014). How to innovate: The essential guide for
fearless school leaders. New York: Teachers College Press.
Collins, J. (2005). Good to great and the social sectors [Monograph]. New York: Harper
Collins
Davidovich, R. (2010). Beyond school improvement: The
journey to innovative leadership. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.
Goodman, A. (2008). Student-led,
teacher-supported conferences: Improving communication across an urban
district. Middle School Journal, 39(3), 48-54
International Baccalaureate Organization.
(2014).
Konkel, M. T. & Gammack, D.D. (2015).
City as text: To blog or not to blog. Honors in practice,
11 147-162.
Shana, Z.A., and Abulibdehb, E.S. (2015).
Engaging students through blogs: Using blogs to boost a course experience. International
Journal of Emerging Technologies In Learning. 10(1). 30-38. doi:10.3991/ijet.v10i1.4240
Comments
Post a Comment